Post by weegeo on Jun 22, 2009 10:14:24 GMT
Good morning sweeney old friend,
To help clear a few little points as well may i suggest that you re-read my first post on this topic, when i made my comments concerning the start of `the troubles`i did say in brackets that i was simpilfing my comment of course i know what the circumstances where in the 60`s and infact more so before that but to try and not get involved in too much of a political argument i kept it short, but in fact when you say about the emergence of a large paramilitary force is quite inaccurate because it wasn`t until the early seventies that they became so strong.
You did infact say `so called christians`but then went on to say that Jesus was their leader and by inference that would mean `born again `as only these folks would accept Him as their leader so i`m afraid on that point you fall of the box lol Now if you would like to have a theological discussion on the other religions i`m more than happy to oblige although i don`t think it would be for this forum, but the offer is there. I agree that what has happened here recently is a danm disgrace as once again we are brought back into the media again for all the wrong reasons thanks to a few hoodlums and i`m glad that a few arrests have been made though i`m sure all they will get is the obligatory smack on the wrists and told to be good boys.
I hope this clears up my take on your post and i need to also say that none off what you said offended me i just needed to clear a few points up
weegeo--------------- sharing sweeney`s soapbox
To help clear a few little points as well may i suggest that you re-read my first post on this topic, when i made my comments concerning the start of `the troubles`i did say in brackets that i was simpilfing my comment of course i know what the circumstances where in the 60`s and infact more so before that but to try and not get involved in too much of a political argument i kept it short, but in fact when you say about the emergence of a large paramilitary force is quite inaccurate because it wasn`t until the early seventies that they became so strong.
You did infact say `so called christians`but then went on to say that Jesus was their leader and by inference that would mean `born again `as only these folks would accept Him as their leader so i`m afraid on that point you fall of the box lol Now if you would like to have a theological discussion on the other religions i`m more than happy to oblige although i don`t think it would be for this forum, but the offer is there. I agree that what has happened here recently is a danm disgrace as once again we are brought back into the media again for all the wrong reasons thanks to a few hoodlums and i`m glad that a few arrests have been made though i`m sure all they will get is the obligatory smack on the wrists and told to be good boys.
I hope this clears up my take on your post and i need to also say that none off what you said offended me i just needed to clear a few points up
weegeo--------------- sharing sweeney`s soapbox
